News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Downfall Attacks by H8crilA on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @04:30PM (#37055063)
What about burstable instances on AWS, and whatever is the equivalent in other clouds? Hard to imagine those having a dedicated core, would probably defeat the purpose.
Re:Downfall Attacks by watermelon0 on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @04:52PM (#37055289)
Not just burstable instances.

AWS Fargate, container as a service, allows specifying 0.25 or 0.5 CPU, and I would be surprised if those weren't shared.

Same probably? also applies to AWS Lambda.

Re:Downfall Attacks by tracker1 on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @06:40PM (#37056444)
My guess is there's likely less value in trying to target those kinds of environments... Just poking random data out of lambda or low end vps neighbors is a needle in a haystack the size of the moon in terms of finding anything useful.

It's more likely useful as part of a group of exploits to hit an individual, targeted system.

Re:Downfall Attacks by TrapLord_Rhodo on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @06:58PM (#37069518)
>Just poking random data out of lambda or low end vps neighbors is a needle in a haystack the size of the moon in terms of finding anything useful.

LLM's might change that. getting a firehouse of data and asking it to classify controls against NIST 53- rev5 produces interesting results.

Re:Downfall Attacks by c2h5oh on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @06:47PM (#37056510)
Worse: by default it's not CPU but VCPU - a single core with multithreading = 2 VCPU
Re:Downfall Attacks by schlarpc on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @05:06PM (#37055462)