I always wonder, where were the social action warriors the day before this article was published? Silent somehow, despite women enduring the same problems for ages.
Makes the comment seem hypocritical, or at least self-serving.
Not disputing that equality should go both ways. Just sad that it's all silence until men feel threatened.
Having never written them I genuinely have no frame of reference but would be interested to find data to back this up since it's quite the lofty assertion.
I would more likely have guessed that aptitude in these areas was not as strong for some other reason.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/08/18/a-level-grades-g...
> Boys also retook the lead over girls at the top grade for maths in 2022 after girls out-performed boys at the A* grade for the first time in 2021. Last year, 29.1 per cent of girls were awarded A*, compared with 28.5 per cent of boys.
I think it's wise to avoid looking for misogynists in every conversation about gender. It makes life more pleasant! :)
If you're concerned about consistency, there's a pretty obvious place to start and it isn't random HN commenters you know nothing about.
We should always go to data but the education system should strive to give people a chance. Maybe the problem is way earlier in this case but it's worth trying.
The rest of the year, silence.
That was my point.
Double standards go both ways - if men are demonstrably struggling I don't think it's unreasonable to give them a bit of a push. I would expect the same consideration for women.
Ultimately, let the person choose whether or not they want to apply or go into a profession that doesn't require post secondary education and apply supports where needed.