Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by brfox on Monday August 07, 2023 @10:49AM
(#37035239)
Anthropic's Claude summarized this, too (the article was too long for ChatGPT):
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by andromaton on Monday August 07, 2023 @11:21AM
(#37035700)
Not wrong. Misses the last act (Clarence II).
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by TX81Z on Monday August 07, 2023 @11:37AM
(#37035917)
Kinda fascinating, it almost surgically removes the entire human interest angle which is the soul of the story that makes it land so strongly. This summary is flat and boring, like a summary of a quarterly SEC filing.
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by lucubratory on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:43PM
(#37042482)
Anthropic more than the other three really tries quite hard to depersonalise and dehumanise their LLM. It must be particularly important to them.
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by TX81Z on Monday August 07, 2023 @11:24PM
(#37044147)
Mission accomplished I guess? Utterly soulless and boring - for a computer no less - but if that’s what they wanted, sure.
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by lucubratory on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @08:17AM
(#37047826)
Yeah, I suspect your result is exactly what they want. I don't know if they fully realise that people don't want that, but they will eventually.
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by TX81Z on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:11PM
(#37095165)
Eh, they seem to have a holier than thou attitude, I’m sure the Know What’s Best.
Re:The $1M shot that changed sports contests forever
by runeks on Monday August 07, 2023 @12:12PM
(#37036407)
> In April 1993, Don Calhoun made a miraculous full-court shot during a Chicago Bulls game to win $1 million.
Wrong. It was a three quarters court shot (behind the penalty line of the other half of the court).