Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by Plankaluel on Monday August 07, 2023 @10:24AM (#37034879)

Yeah, I think unless the authors are deliberatly misleading the public (which is of course a possibility, though not very likely I think) it is hard to imagine a scenario where all of this won't turn out to be highly interesting in one way or another (even if it might turn out to not be a superconductor)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by harles on Monday August 07, 2023 @10:32AM (#37034991)

I really doubt there’s intentional fraud here, but they were forced to publish (or pre-print to be pedantic) early. [0] This certainly led to less rigor.

[0]: https://twitter.com/8teAPi/status/1684385895565365248 apologies for the Twitter link, I didn’t have time to find a better source.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by bestcoder69 on Monday August 07, 2023 @01:24PM (#37037580)

That Twitter user is making up details and writing a fan-fic: https://twitter.com/8teAPi/status/1686217806298423299?s=20

So you won’t find any other sources, other than other people who have also been misled by @8teAPi.

Frustrating because it’s also chaotic, trying to keep the events straight.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by xvector on Monday August 07, 2023 @08:53PM (#37043083)

This is hilarious. I love that @8teAPi did this, hopefully it knocks some sense into people.

[ Parent | on HN ]