News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims. Parent comment

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by weebull on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:21AM (#37032976)
That would prove that they'd done it, but not that anyone knew how (including the original authors). If this is going to be useful, we need to know how to make it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by will5421 on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:48AM (#37033183)
It could be reverse-engineered.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by esrauch on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:57AM (#37033249)
If they can prove this one sample is a room temperature semiconductor that would surely be relevant in deciding how much time to spend on trying to create more of the same material.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by PartiallyTyped on Monday August 07, 2023 @09:48AM (#37034414)
It’s like the 4 minute mile tbh. If we know it is possible, we can and will find a way.
[ Parent | on HN ]