News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims. Parent comment

Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by deyiao on Monday August 07, 2023 @06:17AM (#37032526)
However, we have never seen a material with such strong diamagnetism that is not a superconductor
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by stavros on Monday August 07, 2023 @06:22AM (#37032564)
Really? That's encouraging, thanks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by og_kalu on Monday August 07, 2023 @03:47PM (#37039955)
Yes LK-99 if not a superconductor would be the strongest diamagnetic material by orders of magnitude.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims by vintermann on Monday August 07, 2023 @06:57AM (#37032811)
And even if it turns out it isn't a superconductor, that's pretty cool in its own right, no? At least this layman would think so.

And it would go a way in explaining why so many take the claims seriously and try to replicate it, if we know there's something exciting going on either way.

[ Parent | on HN ]