Re:‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ Prepared for 100k Concurrent Players, T...
by ThatPlayer on Sunday August 06, 2023 @04:50PM
(#37026568)
Yeah, it turns out no one review bombs unpopular games that they've never heard of.
Re:‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ Prepared for 100k Concurrent Players, T...
by RHSeeger on Sunday August 06, 2023 @05:16PM
(#37026869)
I'm not a fan of review bombing, and I think it's current player score (2.2 / 1-) is an unfair result of that; the over the top backlash to the changes. That being said, I certainly wouldn't say the 86 / 100 critics view isn't reasonable either. It had issues at release, and it's gotten worse since then. My recommendation would be to give it a few seasons to get into a better shape before picking it up.
It's worth noting that Diablo 3 went through similar pains upon release; though with less "read the room" type issues like they're having now.
Games get review-bombed for the silliest reasons nowadays. Often times, a fundamentalist minority of gamers feels overly protective about "their" franchise, reacting to even the tiniest disturbance with maniacal anger. If a game has a high score from critics and a low score from users, to me that's actually a good sign that the game might even try something interesting (Last of Us II would be an example here). Of course, the critics score for Diablo IV was the post-release score, not including these new patches, so it might very well be that it really is worse now...