I've said this before but it bears repeating: CEO's aren't special. Bob Iger came back to Disney to finish it off. Shit, look at Elizabeth Holmes.
No one deserves that much of a multiple over the people actually creating products or value.
When CEO's fail they get golden parachutes. When they get lucky they are praised as some sort of rare superhuman.
The cult of CEO and HR needs to wither and die
> CEO's aren't special
some CEOs are terrible, a lot are mediocre and a few are indeed special and worth every penny they get and much more (from the utilitarian/rational point of the company’s shareholders). The problem is that it’s very hard to tell in advance..
Not many people can actually perform this job.
This kind of job requires really solid skillset across various domains.
It feels like you not only need to be great at managing people, doing business, having vision, but also do not be bullshitter, so your employees believe in you.
Meanwhile, CEOs strategies aren't something you can test within a month or two and fire CEO and get a new one.
In some industries you need at least a few years in order to see whether specific "bet" was good, so you aren't going to fire your CEO after half of the year.
Meanwhile CEOs decision can have very very costly impact on the company, so the risk is huge.