Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by zeroonetwothree on Saturday August 05, 2023 @01:07PM
(#37014120)
It’s reasonable to be skeptical since past climate models (eg from 20 years ago) didn’t do great over the subsequent period. It could be that current ones are much better (but we won’t know for a while).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by SV_BubbleTime on Saturday August 05, 2023 @01:21PM
(#37014276)
What has changed in 20 years? Realistically.
When we’re the ClimateGate emails? Do you think the industry got itself together after that?
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by notmypenguin on Sunday August 06, 2023 @03:39AM
(#37019776)
That’s a bunch of FUD. Climate science is and has been solid, but fossil fuel industry lobbies have tried to add doubt to what is certain and known. I see your tactics and I call you out on them.
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by SV_BubbleTime on Sunday August 06, 2023 @10:19AM
(#37022234)
Are you saying those emails weren’t real?
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by melagonster on Sunday August 06, 2023 @07:10AM
(#37020791)
science is getting better. most of government hired people to research it, if they can can't promote anything, it is weird.
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by jshen on Saturday August 05, 2023 @02:24PM
(#37014952)
Can you link to these models from 20 years ago?
Re:Reduction of Sulfur Emissions from Ships May Be Causing R...
by conception on Saturday August 05, 2023 @02:55PM
(#37015211)
I don’t think this is the case at all - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/climate-models-have-been-impres...