Re:Norton’s Dome: A simple violation of determinism in Newto...
by xyzzyz on Saturday August 05, 2023 @12:35PM
(#37013721)
The article explicitly discusses the fact that this is possible specifically because of the shape of the dome, and does not work on a hemisphere, precisely for reason you bring up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Norton’s Dome: A simple violation of determinism in Newto...
by kergonath on Saturday August 05, 2023 @01:15PM
(#37014231)
The article explicitly discusses this without demonstrating anything. On it’s face this argument has the weight of these demonstrations.
Re:Norton’s Dome: A simple violation of determinism in Newto...
by eesmith on Saturday August 05, 2023 @01:36PM
(#37014468)
You are right - I misread it.
The next step would be to verify that the paths always stay on the surface. The mathematics shown says the point always follows the surface, but I don't see a demonstration that that's true.
I no longer have the skills to easily do this calculation.