Re:Even people who bought Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses don’t...
by naillo on Friday August 04, 2023 @09:18AM
(#36999607)
> it’s like a dash cam for my head
Basically the reason I wouldn't want to be friends and hang out with anyone wearing them.
Re:Even people who bought Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses don’t...
by sumtechguy on Friday August 04, 2023 @09:55AM
(#37000099)
There is a market for these things. But that market the big companies making them does not seem to understand. They keep doing these big splashy expensive things that most people do not want but some do. So instead of small launches with iteration into good things they come out swinging. Overspend like crazy then the thing looks like a total disaster. All of these companies want hockey stick curves on sales and are totally unsatisfied with small trial runs.
Re:Even people who bought Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses don’t...
by shiftpgdn on Friday August 04, 2023 @01:59PM
(#37003491)
It doesn't roll continuously, but I can press a button and it starts recording. Something I would have missed, especially with little kids, I can now capture.
Re:Even people who bought Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses don’t...
by paulsutter on Friday August 04, 2023 @08:55AM
(#36999311)
While its true that the both the article and title are obvious clickbait and make no effort to present a balanced view.
It's also true that today AR/VR is a tiny niche market of little consequence. That may change when we have much lighter glasses that enable an AI assistant, but today its expensive R&D not a viable consumer product
Re:Even people who bought Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses don’t...
by houseatrielah on Friday August 04, 2023 @09:01AM
(#36999366)
Its great for people with young kids. You can be present and get a spontaneous shot.
I do wish they were water proof and had more battery life, but. Otherwise they’re great.