Re:Successful room temperature ambient-pressure magnetic lev...
by wetmore on Friday August 04, 2023 @03:46AM
(#36996769)
I also hadn't heard about this for what it's worth.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Successful room temperature ambient-pressure magnetic lev...
by cthalupa on Friday August 04, 2023 @03:50AM
(#36996795)
It's one of the reasons people were thinking this might not be a fraud.
Nobel prizes are capped to 3 people, and the speculation is that the rogue person published early to try and ensure they were one of the people that received it. No reason for infighting like that if you know it's a hoax.
Re:Successful room temperature ambient-pressure magnetic lev...
by Iulioh on Friday August 04, 2023 @04:50AM
(#36997255)
I even wondered about that, is ever a thing?
Like saying "SORRY, FIRST" to the nobel committee?
Re:Successful room temperature ambient-pressure magnetic lev...
by oldgradstudent on Friday August 04, 2023 @05:51AM
(#36997694)
> No reason for infighting like that if you know it's a hoax.
There was plenty of bitter infighting over credit during the 1989 cold fusion fiasco.
Knowing it's not a hoax does not mean it is true.
As always, only reproduction attempts matter.