News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by Baeocystin on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @10:40PM (#36966331)
Serious question- I saw the original video, where once they stopped waving the magnet around and held it near the sheet of LK-99, it looked to me like it stayed at a specific standoff distance, with no decay.

Assuming no videographic trickery, what else could it be, other than the Meissner effect?

Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by oceanghost on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @11:22PM (#36966596)
A diamagnetic material.

"In simple terms, diamagnetic materials are substances that are usually repelled by a magnetic field. Electrons in an atom revolve around the nucleus, and thus possess orbital angular momentum. The resultant magnetic momentum in an atom of the diamagnetic material is zero."

Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by Baeocystin on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @11:33PM (#36966662)
Am I correct in my understanding that being capable of self-levitation would be an unusually strong example of the diamagnetic effect?
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by lucubratory on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @12:16AM (#36966889)
Yes, if this material is diamagnetic without being a superconductor it is by far the strongest such material we've ever found. 15x stronger than pyrolitic graphite.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by tavavex on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @12:21AM (#36966916)
From what I heard, it would. This kind of diamagnetism would be strong enough to be potentially interesting in other applications and research, if it turns out not to be a superconductor.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by nine_k on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @01:49AM (#36967387)
Would still be useful for maglev, I assume?
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by ajnin on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @06:54AM (#36969220)
Not over a single dipole magnet. The "shape" of the field wouldn't make it stable, you'd need to add other magnets or a piece of string to stabilise. As I understand stable levitation over a dipole magnet is indicative of flux pinning which is a property exclusive to type II superconductors.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by whatshisface on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @03:21AM (#36967997)
I think ChatGPT wrote that because it is nonsense.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by oceanghost on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @07:44PM (#36979451)
It came from here... correct or incorrect.

https://byjus.com/jee/diamagnetic-materials/

Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by oxfordmale on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @05:21AM (#36968723)
The Meissner effect requires a temperature transition in the diamagnetic behaviour. As you increase the temperature, you would expect a sharp drop with the material falling back on the magnet, and then levitating again once the temperature drops.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99 by jacquesm on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @10:14AM (#36971188)
Yes, if you know the upper boundary for the temperature up to which the material stays superconducting. But that's a bit of a problem: this material is claimed to be superconducting to very high temperatures. It just could be that it isn't all that easy to reach a temperature where this stuff stops being superconducting. In fact I see no particular reason in physics why it would have to stay below the temperature at which the material disintegrates. So maybe that part of the effects is simply a reflection of the fact that these superconductors that work well below zero are in fact exactly there because they require a cold environment and once you find one that doesn't that whole aspect goes away, it could stay diamagnetic all the way up to its melting point.