News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments by yreg on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @08:41PM (#36965387)
naive question: if we can simulate this, can't we brute force other superconductors?
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments by fzzzy on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @08:53PM (#36965494)
Yes, but the search space is mind boggling.
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments by chevman on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @09:35PM (#36965856)
How so? Just a function of all the different atoms and sub-atomic particles interacting?
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments by montecarl on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @01:58PM (#36974474)
I'll link to another reply of mine: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36966474

The "just a function of" is a non-trivial problem. Given a single set of elements you want to "try out" results in a huge global optimization problem to find the set of stable structures (low energy). When aided by experimental data it becomes a tractable problem.

Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments by adw on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @10:43PM (#36966359)
Not really. Think of this as being analogous to public key/private key crypto; it's easy to check a signature (simulate a structure), it's extremely hard to forge one (design a new material ab initio).