Re:Origin of correlated isolated flat bands in LK99
by notfish on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:46AM
(#36952434)
Defining LK-99 as “the thing you get from following the steps in this paper” and not “the allegedly superconducting material these guys have a sample of” is silly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Origin of correlated isolated flat bands in LK99
by dcow on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @01:00AM
(#36952505)
Why? I've always understood it to be the thing the paper describes.
Re:Origin of correlated isolated flat bands in LK99
by carabiner on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @01:12AM
(#36952580)
You say potato... The paper is fucking vague on all counts, from synthesis to result. "LK-99" at this point is understood to be most likely a mixture of compounds. It is not fully defined, it is not one "thing," it's broad proposal that encompasses a family of materials.