Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by goatlover on Monday July 31, 2023 @10:20PM
(#36951579)
Also weird that they just repeated back exactly ChatGPT. How lazy can you be?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You'd be surprised. After all, if we were not lazy we'd be still digging the ground with our bare hands. "How do I get X while doing less work" is a kind of laze that defines human.
The engineer’s three virtues: Laziness, Impatience, Hubris
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by hef19898 on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @03:59AM
(#36953542)
laziness can be a good thing! Real lazy people put in a lot of effort to achieve the same outcome working less!
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by robertlagrant on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @08:23AM
(#36955083)
Sounds as though you've read the page before.
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by WarOnPrivacy on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @09:19AM
(#36955580)
Procrastination too. I've had things go off the rails because procrastination wasn't allowed to manifest opportunities.
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by red75prime on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @05:03AM
(#36953945)
> "How do I get X while doing less work"
And we'd still be using neanderthal tools if everyone just copy-pasted previous work.
Reminds me of Ron Burgundy!
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by cromulent on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:32AM
(#36952329)
Absolutely. Reminded me of Chris Pratt's famous P&R flu scene ad lib "Leslie, I typed your symptoms into the thing up here and it says you could have network connectivity problems".
Re:How to Get ChatGPT to Stop Apologizing?
by vidarh on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @03:23AM
(#36953322)
Many years ago I had someone copy and paste two pages from an Oracle manual, complete with formatting, in response to an e-mailed screening question about MySQL that required a one line answer. It was just an initial screening where we had relatively low expectations and halfway expected a lot of people to search - letting a few too many people through was ok, we just wanted to whittle down the pool.
But after that we realised the screening worked even better when we input random sentences from the answers into Google and used it to weed out the people who were not just dishonest enough to give a verbatim answer from somewhere without disclosing it, but who very often did so in ways that meant they got it horribly wrong. E.g. another example was the guy who copied and pasted a forum post. Not only was the answer wrong, but it was followed on the forum by a large number of responses from other people explaining why it was wrong.