By my count, two out of the three are reasonably considered “excess” and are seemingly not being questioned as claimed by the headline.
"Stop the biological functioning" (wink wink) of 10 powerful people, out of the blue, with this as the reason, and say 10 more are coming, "some time" - this will make no difference, Oracle?
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: we just had to ask you the other day to stop posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36857356. I don't want to ban you but if this keeps up, we're going to have to—so please fix this.
The issue with mass consumption by the wealthy is how it influences the behavior of the more impactful middle and lower classes.
In the Steve Jobs biography I was originally shocked that he and his wife had hours long debates about whether or not to use a drying machine (vs hanging laundry outside). For a long time I never saw what he was fighting for, but now it makes sense to me.
There is huge range between excess and shortage. There are people in developed world who do not drive their kids in SUVs. There are people in developed world who walk their kids to school. Good urban design / spatial planning is better for live and environment.
> we will do nothing about climate change
We will do nothing. This attitude is just looking for excuses. CO2 emissions per capita in Austria are half of those in USA.
Let’s redo the headline: - People driving their kids to school is driving the climate crisis - People having enough to eat is driving the climate crisis - People taking nice vacations with their families and friends is driving the climate crisis
The problem doesn’t seem too easy to solve now.
Just as we can’t fund a robust welfare state by taxing the rich alone (everyone must pay high taxes for it to be enough), we will do nothing about climate change by focusing only on superemitters (most aspects of life must be decarbonized if we’re going to stop climate change).