Re:CNN to buy Mashable for $200 million +
by simondlr on Monday March 12, 2012 @05:35AM
(#3692824)
Has anyone felt Mashable sort of deteriorated the past few months?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I was never very impressed by Mashable. Far too much linkbait.
Re:CNN to buy Mashable for $200 million +
by joelhaasnoot on Monday March 12, 2012 @05:56AM
(#3692872)
Far too many "100 ways to" or "Be sure not to miss" and then their "tips" being rehashing of other people's work or thigns I could've thought of myself too, especially with a little Google work.
Mashable is essentially a low-quality content farm. Certainly no place for a self-respecting geek to get tech news.
Seems to work to sell for $200M :-)
No. Rather seems to be a _part_ of work that got them to sell for $200MM. Mashable has executives with very deep connections. I say this was more important.
Mashable represents what media has become; popularist, global and free. This is largely driven by us believe it or not, with help from the Internet off course.
Re:CNN to buy Mashable for $200 million +
by MattBearman on Monday March 12, 2012 @07:12AM
(#3693012)
I pretty much stopped reading Mashable when I discovered HN. I probably haven't been on Mashable at all in the last 6 months, as the last I did there was absolutely nothing of value that I hadn't already seen elsewhere.
I've moved away from sourcing news through multiple news apps like mashable to consuming all my tech news via a news aggregation app called pulse.
Without the "sort of". Mashable has deteriorated noticeably the past few months. It was a pretty interesting blog about social networks. Now it's a pageview machine. The best example of this happened when Bin Laden was killed [1].
I deleted it from my Google Reader months ago, there were a lot of articles daily and few of them were somewhat interesting.