Re:GNU Boot sent a cease and desist to Libreboot
by Propelloni on Sunday July 30, 2023 @05:23AM
(#36929384)
It appears to be a bonfire of vanities on all sides. One side goes "I use the trust you invested in me to block you from project resources, because my other project is soo much better but has less name-recognition." The other side goes "We are more pure, more righteous, and more petty at the same time! Let's show the other side by registering a confusing domain name and release a similiar but still different software with a long blurb why the other side is bad and must be destroyed! Oh yeah, and let's write scathing e-mails so nobody misses that we are petty."
This seems so weird to me. Why invest the energy? In the olden days we'd just fork and get to work.
Re:GNU Boot sent a cease and desist to Libreboot
by whstl on Sunday July 30, 2023 @05:37AM
(#36929464)
'One side goes"I use the trust you invested in me to block you from project resources, because my other project is soo much better but has less name-recognition"'
As some of us already said multiple times, this is a completely different story and unrelated to this. Let's maybe lets this misunderstanding die?
Re:GNU Boot sent a cease and desist to Libreboot
by pravus on Sunday July 30, 2023 @06:24AM
(#36929719)
Welcome to the GNU universe. This kind of thing was more prominent in the 00's and I've basically sworn off ever contributing to any GPL projects or using GPL licenses because of how GNU has acted over time. At odd times they get extremely vocal over issues and the responses are typically of the "you are wrong" kind.
According to this [1], the alleged takeover you mention not only didn't involve Adrien or Denis Carikli, it also happened two years before the creation of https://libreboot.at, which seems to be from 2023 [2]
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210331005023/https://libreboot... or https://www.andrewrobbins.info/libreboot.html if you want a third-party
[2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/libreboot-devel/2023-0...
Either way, it seems that if there was any problem around the usage of the GNU Boot name, it was solved by adding disclaimers galore: http://notgnuboot.vimuser.org/
To me the disclaimers above show enough good faith. Meanwhile https://libreboot.at continues up. I don't think we should be that harsh and accusatory to someone after they actually comply with the request of changing a page name and adding disclaimers.