Counterterrorism internet surveillance is being retargeted at sex workers

Re:Counterterrorism internet surveillance is being retargete... by zer8k on Saturday July 29, 2023 @05:28PM (#36924849)

> Why focus only on the religious organizations?

Likely because OP hates religion. Their post was a reddit tier hot take on an issue that transcends religious bounds as you've pointed out. It's a common trope about child-abusing priests but people forget the vast majority of these cases occur in schools. Anything to take a shot at the church and paint it as a pedophile training camp, I guess. OPs sources are absolutely garbage.

For the downvoters here's some evidence: a 55% increase in sexual assault from 2016 to 2018 in schools [0]. They estimate it is likely undercounted.

We'd do a lot getting groomers out of school as quickly and as forcefully as we can.

EDIT: Seems I upset the groomers on HN with this post lolz. It's funny OP's trash sources are getting upvotes and I'm getting downvoted to hell. Perhaps HN needs to cull it's own groomer population.

EDIT 2: Stay mad groomers.

[0] https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/sexua...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Counterterrorism internet surveillance is being retargete... by Supermancho on Saturday July 29, 2023 @05:41PM (#36924966)

Perhaps posts that lead and end by hurling childhood insults, paired with vague statements presenting as obvious facts, is always going to be considered noise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Counterterrorism internet surveillance is being retargete... by weaknit on Saturday July 29, 2023 @06:59PM (#36925695)

A weak nitpick, no substantial responses to the inconvenient facts provided, instead make it go away is the typical hn style, just like joe biden, just pretend it doesnt exist, censor, deny, and lie lie lie.

[ Parent | on HN ]