Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit and transparent apps

Re:Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit an... by spstoyanov on Saturday July 29, 2023 @02:18PM (#36922979)

Yes, I would love to get some feedback on what people want to see - right now I am thinking Bard and Claude. What do you want to have?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit an... by CharlesW on Saturday July 29, 2023 @02:44PM (#36923198)

Support for llama.cpp seems like it'd be really interesting for folks who don't want to send data back and forth to LLMaaS providers. https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit an... by spstoyanov on Saturday July 29, 2023 @03:06PM (#36923398)

Makes sense! I will look into it

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit an... by politelemon on Saturday July 29, 2023 @02:48PM (#36923254)

For gpt, both OpenAI and Azure OpenAI, I think they are similar implementation, you just have to provide some additional parameters like deployment name and different URL.

For non gpt options, I like Claude and Amazon titan. Claude is definitely good.

I'm also currently learning to use llama.cpp I see it has a langchain integration and it's very fast with GPU. So it's useful to be but as a hobbyist.

I've got no experience with bard though. Is it any good?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: LLMFlows – LangChain alternative for explicit an... by spstoyanov on Saturday July 29, 2023 @03:06PM (#36923394)

Thank you for your feedback. Azure OpenAI should be quite easy indeed. I’ve never tried Bard as well and have no clue how popular it is. Also I’ve never heard of Amazon Titan. Thank you for sharing!

[ Parent | on HN ]