Re:Hugging Face, GitHub and more unite to defend open source...
by oytis on Saturday July 29, 2023 @04:37AM
(#36918193)
Uhm... No? Transformer architecture comes from Google, and it's most impressive applications are developed in OpenAI. Public institutions are seemingly just trying to catch up (like Stable Diffusion developed in LMU a year after OpenAI released Dall-E)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hugging Face, GitHub and more unite to defend open source...
by rpastuszak on Saturday July 29, 2023 @05:19AM
(#36918391)
I don’t think I’m getting your point here, SD is superior to Dall-e almost in every way.
Re:Hugging Face, GitHub and more unite to defend open source...
by nologic01 on Saturday July 29, 2023 @06:40AM
(#36918836)
The pattern academia -> commerce is well known (and not in itself evil). At some point in the past decade any ML/AI academic that could spell backpropagation got poached (many from European universities).
Once a domain proves short-tern lucrative, business is more than happy to invest but typically with very pragmatic targets. The recent reorgs in said commercial teams being point in case.
Re:Hugging Face, GitHub and more unite to defend open source...
by oytis on Saturday July 29, 2023 @07:59AM
(#36919374)
That's what called innovation I guess. Innovation introduced by public institutions is rather an exception than a rule - e.g. development of the internet infrastructure was funded publicly at first. What happens normally is that public institutions do fundamental research and businesses innovate. In case of AI businesses seem to be ahead even in fundamental research presently.