They were suggesting that this is a question that is going to be on people's minds, which is very different from suggesting that the answer is yes.
Re:No-GIL mode coming for Python
by Dylan16807 on Saturday July 29, 2023 @05:11AM
(#36918360)
All I can say is that the phrasing looks quite biased to me and it would have been easy to not phrase it that way.
Subtext is hard to prove, but that doesn't make it not real.
Re:No-GIL mode coming for Python
by insanitybit on Saturday July 29, 2023 @09:32AM
(#36920141)
It seems to have clearly been a case of "I remember 2 to 3, that was really bad. I imagine everyone else is wondering this - is this going to be another 2 to 3?"
They were explicitly suggesting something by asking that question.