News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Joel on Software: Anecdotes by JacobAldridge on Wednesday November 19, 2008 @12:25AM (#369181)
An Anecdote can have a place and a purpose - heck, that's most of my blog.

But the plural of 'Anecdote' is not 'Data'.

Re:Joel on Software: Anecdotes by aswanson on Wednesday November 19, 2008 @07:02AM (#369394)
What is data more than a plurality of anecdotes?

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=239392

Re:Joel on Software: Anecdotes by hugh on Wednesday November 19, 2008 @09:43AM (#369486)
A plurality of anecdotes sampled without bias?

That's the problem: interesting data points become anecdotes while uninteresting data points don't, which is why you can't reconstruct the data from the anecdotes.

Re:Joel on Software: Anecdotes by aswanson on Wednesday November 19, 2008 @10:29AM (#369520)
Right, but people always make the statement without qualification. So just saying "the plurality of anecdote is not data" is simply not true. You can say "may not be scientific" or "may be incomplete" but to say it is not data is incorrect.
Re:Joel on Software: Anecdotes by wingo on Wednesday November 19, 2008 @05:55PM (#370060)
A problem with your statement is that you can substitute "data" for "anecdotes":

A plurality of data sampled without bias?

That's the problem: interesting anecdotes become data while uninteresting anecdotes don't, which is why you can't reconstruct the anecdotes from the data.