The genetic machinery for limb regeneration is highly conserved (see reptiles) and predates the appearance of lissamphibians. There's almost zero chance it's possible with endotherms.
This is the paper: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abj2164 and it clearly states they treated a frog (xenopus, a common model organism), which does not normally regenerate when it's an adult. The paper clearly states that they treated with a set of factors that they believe induced a developmental plan- implemented by the transcription of DNA, translation of RNA, and expression of proteins. The initial treatment was removed, and the effect continued.
Also there's nothing about ion channels in this- the factors they used must have been actively transported- they bind to protein receptors.
So from a high level they say they have figured out how to “speak” to cells in a sense and instruct them to start building certain structures. And they emphasize that they aren’t making any changes to the genome or manage any of the low level processes themselves.
Levin's research begs to differ. He did successfully regrow an amputated leg in a frog.