How are Modern Copyright laws helping authors, artists, and actors in those cases?
Re:Llama and ChatGPT Are Not Open-Source
by threeseed on Thursday July 27, 2023 @09:11PM
(#36902085)
It's allowing them to sue OpenAI for copyright infringement:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/05/authors-file-a...
* * *
Re:Llama and ChatGPT Are Not Open-Source
by CamperBob2 on Thursday July 27, 2023 @09:54PM
(#36902332)
Allowing them to block human intellectual progress may not be the long-term win you assume it is.
Re:Llama and ChatGPT Are Not Open-Source
by threeseed on Thursday July 27, 2023 @11:49PM
(#36902955)
And some would argue that billion dollar companies like OpenAI, Meta etc should figure out a way to compensate the people who created the content they depend on.
Re:Llama and ChatGPT Are Not Open-Source
by CamperBob2 on Friday July 28, 2023 @12:09PM
(#36909005)
Making the uncensored, unbiased, un-"aligned" results available to all for a fair price is compensation enough, I think. That's what we should be pushing for.
Whether demon or genie, any notion of putting this tech back in the bottle is a non-starter. As is turning it into a giant money grab for the copyright industry.
That hasn't protected copywritten works in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,....
Copyright may need to be updated to cater for the new world of AI but that doesn't mean as a concept it is evil.