Re:It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
by rwxrwxrwx on Thursday July 27, 2023 @10:54AM
(#36894525)
For the sake of anyone reading this thread who isn't in the know: many of these libraries are really written in C/C++ and have Python bindings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
by mathisfun123 on Thursday July 27, 2023 @04:21PM
(#36899597)
i said ported not implemented; the likelihood that any of those libraries sprout lisp bindings is about as likely as them being rewritten in lisp. so it's the same thing and the point is clear: i don't care about some zany runtime feature, i care about the ecosystem.
Re:It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
by rwxrwxrwx on Friday July 28, 2023 @12:44AM
(#36903177)
Stop moving the goalposts: your answer to a commenter who stated that Common Lisp was faster than Python (a fact) was a list of packages, many of which are (1) not even written in Python and (2) some of them actually do have Common Lisp bindings.