Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by EGreg on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @08:16PM
(#36887038)
“The sheer number of reports, whistleblowers and stories of unidentified anomalous phenomena should raise real questions and warrant investigation and oversight. And that’s why we are here today,” Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the subcommittee, said in his opening statement. "UAPs, whatever they may be, may pose a serious threat to our military or civilian aircraft. And that must be understood."
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by thewildginger on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:14PM
(#36888041)
AOC was there and did ask a question that provided the only name of a possibly involved department.
If anyone's reading this, I would recommend watching the hearings. It was very serious for everyone, on both sides of the aisle. The partisanship was left at the door, and the allegations were serious.
People probably don't believe the whistleblower, I understand. Regardless, accusations of serious government fraud from someone of his tenure should be investigated. You don't give up your whole career over a possibility of fraud or more.
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by thewildginger on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:07PM
(#36887989)
Two presidents claimed to have seen a UFO. Both never declassified it. One even ran on that promise. Barack Obama and his wife are producing a documentary about a famous UFO event currently. If there is a UAP program, the presidents are not told about it, probably because of the possibility of a mishandling of that information, that's what I think. If, of course, you think it exists at all.
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by somewhat_drunk on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:06PM
(#36887973)
Not necessarily, but I do think that if there's a big UFO coverup dating back half a century, it's obviously highly compartmentalized, and probably more tightly controlled than your run-of-the-mill top secret (or even SCI) documents. Trump's a clown, it's obvious he's a clown, and the people who control such a hypothetical UFO program would do everything in their power to prevent such a clown from 1) becoming aware of their program, and if necessary 2) gaining access to information about their program.
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by calebio on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:12PM
(#36888028)
I have often wondered what the definition of "need to know" (one of the requirements for being read into classified information) is for a President, a temporary government employee.
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by somewhat_drunk on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @09:48PM
(#36887825)
You can trust Gaetz and the rest of the Trump-simping chucklefuck gang even less than you can trust a "normal" politician, which is really saying something. I'm sure they all sense they will soon be flushed like the detritus they are along with the orangered one himself, so they'll all be grasping at straws to save themselves. It won't work, but that won't stop them from trying.
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by clemailacct1 on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:09PM
(#36888001)
Your clear bias and overly emotional responses makes me dismiss want you’re trying to say. Can you try rephrasing everything in a clear and data driven approach?
Re:Gaetz claims he’s seen UAP image that can’t be attached t...
by somewhat_drunk on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @10:22PM
(#36888106)
I think you're confused about the distinction between bias and insults. Insults do not necessarily indicate bias.
I said what I wanted to say, exactly how I wanted to say it. If you wish to verify my implicit, quantifiable claim (that Trump and company are going down), I would direct you to google for things like the 2022 midterm results, opinion polls, and the number and strength of his various state and federal indictments. It's not looking good for Trump.
If you are unsure about the character of Trump and company, I would suggest your thought process, not mine, is the one wracked with bias. We can certainly discuss that further, if you'd like?
If anyone's reading this, I would recommend watching the hearings. It was very serious for everyone, on both sides of the aisle. The partisanship was left at the door, and the allegations were serious.
People probably don't believe the whistleblower, I understand. Regardless, accusations of serious government fraud from someone of his tenure should be investigated. You don't give up your whole career over a possibility of fraud or more.
Project headlines only the military and government can get to the bottom of with plenty of funding
I said what I wanted to say, exactly how I wanted to say it. If you wish to verify my implicit, quantifiable claim (that Trump and company are going down), I would direct you to google for things like the 2022 midterm results, opinion polls, and the number and strength of his various state and federal indictments. It's not looking good for Trump.
If you are unsure about the character of Trump and company, I would suggest your thought process, not mine, is the one wracked with bias. We can certainly discuss that further, if you'd like?