News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Intelligence Self-Limiting? by pjscott on Saturday March 10, 2012 @03:10PM (#3688587)
Imagine a human genius. Now imagine that same genius with a brain that thinks the same thoughts, but a hundred times faster. Now imagine a million instances of that person.

At no point in this thought experiment have we changed the thoughts this person can think. If any of these sped-up million geniuses took an IQ test or something, the score would be the same. And yet, they would seem superhumanly intelligent by any reasonable definition of the phrase.

I doubt that evolution -- with a crazy biological substrate, no less -- somehow managed to find an upper limit on intelligence.

Re:Is Intelligence Self-Limiting? by stcredzero on Saturday March 10, 2012 @04:03PM (#3688724)
Everything we know about genetic algorithms would lead us to believe that evolution has found an upper limit -- but only in a very specific context with respect to the environment, available resources, and evolutionary baggage.

Everything I know about the development of technology leads me to believe that any given trans-human AI will also somehow be a local maxima.

Re:Is Intelligence Self-Limiting? by im3w1l on Saturday March 10, 2012 @07:28PM (#3689176)
We have not converged.
Re:Is Intelligence Self-Limiting? by randallsquared on Saturday March 10, 2012 @07:29PM (#3689179)
If you consider a million canine geniuses at a hundredfold speedup, I think the problem becomes clear: they wouldn't even match one human. What you've described is a civilization, effectively, and while a civilization can accomplish much that a single member cannot, they're still not more intelligent.