Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by kolinko on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @09:02AM
(#36876959)
It is an option, but there are two downsides:
- such a current generates a huge electromagnetic field. So it won't work for a car battery, but may work for grid storage.
- price - there is a limit to how much current you can store, and so far this was the limiting factor - i.e. we don't really care about room temperature superconductivity in this case, but we care about the price of materials to build such batteries
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by willis936 on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:04AM
(#36878885)
I'm pretty sure you can pick coil geometries that cancel external magnetic fields. There may be some stray fields, but they can be quite modest with tight manufacturing tolerances.
It's an interesting idea worth exploring. The two places where I think feasibility may face challenge is in the energy density gated by critical current density and magnetic field and in raw discharge rate (giant inductors are not known for being able to change their current quickly).
Knowing peak capacity and aging is also tricky since you can't measure critical limits without hitting a quench (a very, very bad scenario). You'll need to maintain healthy margins so you don't have things blowing up on sunny days or after so many charge/discharge cycles.
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by peterfirefly on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @11:13AM
(#36879050)
The energy density is absurdly low.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energ...
Compare with this table:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density#In_chemical_rea...