News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor. Parent comment

Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by PBnFlash on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @08:26PM (#36871573)
Okay I can believe super conductivity, but having LK-99 a registered trademark already is where I draw the line.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by kuschku on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @06:44AM (#36875493)
Considering they've published dozens of papers on these experiments over the past months, it doesn't sound too unusual so far.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by carlintveld on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @07:14AM (#36875765)
Is it even possible to have super conduction at room temperature? I always thought it was highly associated with cold temperatures.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by smolder on Thursday July 27, 2023 @10:43AM (#36894357)
Until and unless this story gets proven true, it's unknown. We can't reliably predict what materials will have what properties.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by Quiark on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @07:17AM (#36875805)
True, I would prefer "unobtanium"
[ Parent | on HN ]