I don't know why they don't have a proper blog, but you might find these links helpful:

https://browsercompany.substack.com/archive

https://www.youtube.com/@TheBrowserCompany

Can't watch video right now, but the blog isn't helpful. I just want to know about the browser, not all the navel-gazing around the browser. But, since another commenter mentioned you need an account to use the browser at all, it doesn't matter anyway.

Agreed. I don't use a Mac anymore, but I've been hearing about this browser and how excellent it is, but their website does such an awful job of conveying anything that I'm surprised anyone ever started using it. Actually, to give them some credit, they seem to have redone the site somewhat, and it now actually has screenshots. Last time I visited it barely had a description of the product, so I guess they're headed in the right direction.

>I've been hearing about this browser and how excellent it is

from real people, or probably-paid articles on tech blogs?

The Youtuber MKBHD has a podcast[0] where they have mentioned that many in their office has switched over to it. I'm not sure I quite understand their enthusiasm for it, but I don't think they're paid shills.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEcrRXW3oEYfUctetZTAWLw

> Youtuber

Are you sure it is not product placement?

the venn diagram of people who say Arc is good, and people who say NordVPN is good, is a circle.

maybe not everybody who says arc is good is being paid to say that. but they are all people who accept money to say things like "arc is good". MKBHD included.

I‘ve used browsers since they first appeared, pretty much all of them, and I love Arc.

This has been my primary issue with Arc. I can't tell what it is and the copy on the website reads like it comes from the world's most pretentious designer. I feel like any tech blogger covering this can't be taken seriously when they say "I just decided to give Arc a try because of how it looks" when there were 0 pictures on the website and the intro heading was literally "Arc is a browser". Okay Arc.

What's the point with a bunch of information when you can just download it and try for yourself? If you're at the car dealership, don't you want to take a car for a test ride first, before getting into more details?

Because you want to know what it is like before installing it? From what I gather so far this is not an executable I trust and feel comfortable running on my personal computer.

Back in the day, it would take ages to download and install software, and it could mess up your system. If now was then, I'd see your point.

But if you don't trust a software, then you should never install it, and you should never ask for reinsurance from the software makers. If their goal is to compromise personal computers, then they will also lie in any information they put out.

It's like being at a car dealer that you think is a criminal, and asking him to double-pinky swear that the car you're looking at wasn't stolen.

Why? Are you paranoid? Are you a spy on a secret assignment?

I downloaded it to try for myself on iOS, but the app requires that you first create an account on a Mac before you can use it on iOS.

Everything about this browser reminds me of Apple's product pages. All marketing speak, vague, empty promises, and loads of hype everywhere for things I'm doing already on what I have right now.

It worked for Apple so I can't blame them for trying, but it makes the entire thing feel so empty.

It looks like someone mashed the basic features Microsoft built into Edge into a a frame around Webkit with one or two cool features.

I don't want to go all https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 but Microsoft Edge seems to be doing most of the features this browser seems to have and more, and it's from a software company I expect to still exist in five years.