I'm building furniture myself and not using Ikea.
I never go to Starbucks and I've had McDonalds probably 5 times in ten years.
This reinforces my point, millions of other people go to McDonalds each day because it's cheap food, I can't judge them for it.
So me never eating McDonalds and building my own furniture from recycled timber means hardly anything and the rain forest is still fucked.
The US Government should do more about it. Not me.
Soy it is then ;)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2019.0003...
Soybean is one of the primary ingredients in poultry diets ...
77% of soy is for animal feed (source higher in the thread)
> So me never eating it means hardly anything and the rain forest is still fucked. ... Not me.
> The US Government should do more about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
Be well.
I'll assume you're a vegetarian, and you're probably eating legumes and the legumes you're eating are exported from a country where people cannot afford them. This was an issue I had with being vegetarian, one, I was hungry and tired a lot of the time and I needed a lot more time to prepare meals to feel better. Second, most legumes I had access too where taken from India, Mexico and South Amerca, thus people in those countries were going without.
I'll continue to eat food...and if I can't get access to it readily, I'll take it by other means.
So I get it, you're being smug, but you're dismissing the fact that people need to eat food. This should have priority over burning fossil fuels for energy.
You've not refuted shit with your graphs.
McDonalds isn't going to shut down for you. They' just drop their prices to lure people back.
Be well.
One takes 77% of the land, the other one 7%. We have so many animals to feed, that we need to deforest the Amazon (that was the discussion about, wasn't it) to be able to feed them all.
Just by those numbers alone it's clear that without the need to feed those armies of domestic animals we'd been able to slash international trade of those foods significantly. Were we not growing corn and seeds for animals, we'd have a lot of space to feed our populations with veggies.
> which have chopped down many of their forests, such as the USA
Again, if our needs were not that high, we wouldn't need to cut anything, but we'd be able to regrow them.
> I'll assume you're a vegetarian
No, vegan. And by choosing to eat legumes and peas I'm using 10-100x less land compared to the regular carnist.
> an issue I had with being vegetarian, one, I was hungry and tired
Sometimes people try to remove meat and eating just the rest. Or when being vegan, to be a fruitarian or eat raw veggies. Or they eat just the processed stuff. Beer, cocacola and oreos are vegan, but not healthy and cannot sustain you for long.
You have to make sure you're eating properly. In this day and age there are caloric tables online, meal plans, sites full of recipes, studies etc. etc. But let's not pretend it's overly complicated.
25% of your plate should be proteins (lentils, beans, tofu, tempeh, seitan, peas ...), 25% whole grains (brown rice, quinoa, whole wheat bread, whole grain pasta), 30% vegetables (variety of colors to get different nutriets), 10-15% fruit (apple, banana, berries), 5-10% fats (avocados, nuts, seeds, or a drizzle of olive oil).
That's it. No vegans think twice about it when cooking. Variety is a key for filling and healthy diet. With such diet you won't feel hungry.
I did it wrong too, few decades ago, turned vegetarian and ate as badly as my girlfriend did. I couldn't do it longer than few months, then ate meat for many years again, in big quantities, until I've realized how big problem the animal ag is for the planet and for survival of our children. Then I've learned cooking vegan and have not been hungry or feeling deprived of anything since :)
> I'll continue to eat food...and if I can't get access to it readily, I'll take it by other means
See ... animal ag will leave us scorched earth and gives us very real chance of an environmental collapse. Then people with such attitudes will fight for the scraps. I'd prefer if we'd tried to prevent such future.
> you're dismissing the fact that people need to eat food
You're dismissing plants as not being food. We eat meat for 4 reasons, and for 4 reasons only: tradition, convenience, culture, and taste. We already get something like 63% proteins and 82% of calories from plants.
> You've not refuted shit with your graphs.
Those graphs (and studies) are better than you think.
> I have to watch the Amazon being chopped down
https://ourworldindata.org/drivers-of-deforestation
The research suggests that by far the largest driver of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has been driven by the expansion of pasture land for beef production, soy is likely to have played at least some role in the loss of forest.
More than three-quarters (77%) of global soy is fed to livestock for meat and dairy production. Just 7% of soy is used directly for human food products such as tofu, soy milk, edamame beans, and tempeh.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/weve-lost-35-pe...
The Southern Brazilian Amazon has lost 30 percent of its forests, and if the destruction doesn’t stop, the area will lose 56 percent of its forests by 2050. Environmental scientists argue the loss of the Amazon will have a global impact ...
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/feb/19/colombia...
Cattle, not coca, drive deforestation of the Amazon in Colombia – report
https://phys.org/news/2022-08-global-forest-area-capita-decr...
New study finds global forest area per capita has decreased by over 60%
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jun/02/t...
https://earth.org/major-companies-responsible-for-deforestat...
1. Cargill (soy & beef)
3. Wilmar International Ltd. (soy)
4. Walmart (palm oil, pulp and paper, soy, and beef)
5. JBS (beef)
6. IKEA
9. Starbucks
10. McDonald’s
11. Yum! Brands (KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell)
13. Ahold (meat)
https://news.mongabay.com/2023/05/3-million-hectares-of-colo...
3 million hectares of Colombian Amazon deforested for illegal pasture: Study
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jun/02/more-tha...
More than 800m Amazon trees felled in six years to meet beef demand
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/
Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4110/htm
Which Diet Has the Least Environmental Impact on Our Planet? A Systematic Review of Vegan, Vegetarian and Omnivorous Diets
https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food
What are the carbon opportunity costs of our food?
https://www.wri.org/insights/without-changing-diets-agricult...
Without Changing Diets, Agriculture Alone Could Produce Enough Emissions to Surpass 1.5°C of Global Warming
... and many more ...
> some how it's something I'm doing wrong?
You have to answer that.