News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by tivert on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @10:13AM (#36862539)
> Related: I've often been looking how to do X, find an SO question asking that, but the answerers there refused to answer until the person explained why they wanted to do X, and then all the answers (correctly) told the person that they actually needed to do Y and explained quite well how to do Y.

> I actually need to do X, so those answers are useless to me.

I know what you mean. Whenever I (rarely) ask a question on Stack Overflow, I always have to defensively load it up with language anticipating misinterpretations and instructing people to answer my question and not some other one.

Otherwise, internet-point-chasers will fall through the woodwork giving easy, worthless advice. Even with all the defensive language, a few always show up.

Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by texuf on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @10:33AM (#36862843)
Sounds like you’re good at prompt engineering
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by firesteelrain on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @10:19AM (#36862627)
> defensively load it up

Agree. This isn't a problem on the partner/sister sites as much. They are very helpful too. But they don't show up on Google