Re:Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit ...
by marcus_holmes on Monday July 24, 2023 @03:38AM
(#36844257)
Which is getting back to the religious crap of "sex is only for reproduction, between a married couple". Yes sex can result in reproduction, but I think making that its primary purpose misses the point. We experience a desire to fuck, separate from our desire to reproduce. They're two different things that are only related in a tiny minority of circumstances. Classifying someone's sexuality by its possible reproductive outcome is like classifying their tongues by the ability to curl into a tube: kinda valid, but not that useful.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit ...
by pdntspa on Monday July 24, 2023 @11:51AM
(#36849925)
No, it's not. You are reading into things. There is no elevating one modality above the other, they are related but different.
Why are you projecting your own biases into my statement? Call a spade a spade. What you take away beyond that is on you.
Re:Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit ...
by marcus_holmes on Monday July 24, 2023 @10:28PM
(#36857132)
> There is no elevating one modality above the other, they are related but different.
You grouped all sexual activity into two groups: "normal" and "not normal". I think if anyone is projecting bias, it's that.