News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by doctorpangloss on Friday July 21, 2023 @01:25PM (#36816702)
> The whole legal premise of these models is that training on copyrighted material is fair use.

Not to diminish the conversation here, but not even a Supreme Court Justice knows what the legality is. You’d have to be a whole 9 person Supreme Court to make an accurate statement here. I don’t think anyone really knows how Congress meant today’s laws to work in this scenario.

Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by mschuster91 on Friday July 21, 2023 @06:59PM (#36821127)
> I don’t think anyone really knows how Congress meant today’s laws to work in this scenario.

Congress, or more accurate, the drafters of the Constitution, intended that Congress would work to keep the Constitution updated to match the needs of modern times. Instead, Congress ossified to the point it's unable to pass basic laws because a bunch of far right morons hold the House GQP hostage and an absurd amount of leverage was passed to the executive and the Supreme Court as a result - with the active aid of both parties by the way, who didn't even think of passing actual laws to codify something as important as equitable access to elections, fair elections, or the right to have an abortion or to smoke weed. And on top of that your Supreme Court and many Federal court picks were hand-selected from a society that prefers a literal viewpoint of the constitution.

But fear not, y'all are not alone in this kind of idiocy, just look at us Germans and how we're still running on fax machines.