very interesting.

sounds simple as well as deep at the same time if that's how it works.

I also wonder if there is a way for instructions to dynamically alter settings like temperature and verbosity.

for example when generating syntactic output like json or code ...don't be too creative with syntax at line level but at conceptual or approach level, go ahead and be wild.

I think it is totally reasonable to describe the model as "thinking". Unless you have discovered exactly how the brain works and exactly what "thinking" is (in a precise scientific way). In which case please enlighten us!

What else you would call it? The brain is just electrical pathways firing too. There's nothing fundamentally special about the brain.

You don't know how the human brain works. The brain gives us consciousness.

These two things make it extremely special. Probably the most special thing on earth.

Emergent properties are interesting, but it is still just electrical conduction in an electrolyte soup. We have no idea what constructs of matter do or do not have consciousness, it's possible all matter has some form of it. It's entirely possible the brain is utterly unspecial in that regard.

Regardless, we're talking about cognitive thinking and decision making, not consciousness. The two are not dependant on each other.

To be clear, I agree with you. We haven't discovered anything in the brain that a computer couldn't simulate, so there's no reason to believe "thinking" is reserved for humans.

It doesn't have to be able to actually quietly think in order to act like it does and give a very different kind of response as a result.