Collecting lots of signatures isn’t Docusign’s value prop.
The value is signature certification, and a proven track record in court.
A single signature on a PDF is not technically difficult. The machinery to reasonably guarantee that it was you who signed the PDF is the thing that matters.
The value increases from there as the complexity of the document being signed increases.
Really the only thing that DocuSign does is timestamp the actions on the document. In order to get that a self hosted implementation would need some kind of third party system to act as a witness.
None of this guarantees Person A signed the doc, but the point is to systematically collect as much info as possible to be used if someone does sue, and to check the boxes that customers need checked in a consistent manner that they can sell as an effective solution that stands up in court.
I’m not saying they’re doing anything unique here, but customers - especially enterprise customers - buy it for all of these things, not just because it makes coordinating many signatures easier.
The typical “no one gets fired for buying DocuSign” adage applies here.
This link has list of different IDs they support in different countries:
https://support.docusign.com/s/document-item?language=en_US&...
My point that it doesn't really matter that much. If I DocuSigned some contract, delivered work described in the contract, maybe got paid for some of that, and then later some dispute comes up.. at that point we're arguing about terms or other facts.. Neither party is going to be in any position to argue "oh I never DocuSigned that agreement" because all of the other work and communication and transactions are enough to prove that's not true.
Whether that’s worth Docusign’s pricing or if there’s better alternatives, up to you. But it’s objectively a helpful tool.