Re:When Open Becomes Opaque: The Changing Face of Open-Sourc...
by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @05:24PM
(#36793640)
I thought Linux had better support for realtime workloads these days? I mean, yes, I would still prefer a dedicated micro, but if you need a Real Computer in the mix it might be possible to get better results out of it.
Re:When Open Becomes Opaque: The Changing Face of Open-Sourc...
by petsfed on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @06:36PM
(#36794457)
I mean, yes and no. But it also gets into "who is it for?" and while you can do things better, eventually you reach a point where its easier to just do it the right way.
Re:When Open Becomes Opaque: The Changing Face of Open-Sourc...
by petsfed on Thursday July 20, 2023 @01:04PM
(#36803446)
I mean to say, at the point where the I2C library user has to seriously think about patching their kernel, the strengths of the RPi as an out-of-the-box embedded computer are pretty much negated. If you have to do actual embedded engineering things, then the RPi becomes just another SoC dev board.
Re:When Open Becomes Opaque: The Changing Face of Open-Sourc...
by joshish on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @10:31PM
(#36796258)
Probably, but if you think about the final 20% of the workload in optimizing, I think it's safe to say one will be immensely more grueling than the other just by the nature of it.
Not to say that your original comment didn't have merit; the beauty of hobby projects is that you can completely skip the last 20%.
Granted, I write microcontroller firmware for a living these days, but I still use RPis and Arduinos for proof-of-concept work because of the simplicity of the toolchains.