Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by rand_r on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @09:06PM
(#3678298)
Ignoring the US government, what legal use would a company have for un-patched exploits?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by trotsky on Thursday March 08, 2012 @12:45AM
(#3678726)
Penetration testing is the common answer, though that job description can also be a bit of a euphemism.
It is also worth noting that breaking into the computer of a foreign national that is located overseas is often not a crime in the united states, or is at least considered very difficult to prosecute if it doesn't involve fraud, financial transfers or a few other hot buttons.
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by nikcub on Thursday March 08, 2012 @03:08AM
(#3678972)
Fame, reputation, marketing, using 0day in pen-tests, etc.
This isn't new, security companies have been paying contractors for unpublished advisories and exploits for over 15 years now.