News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW... by rand_r on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @09:06PM (#3678298)
Ignoring the US government, what legal use would a company have for un-patched exploits?
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW... by trotsky on Thursday March 08, 2012 @12:45AM (#3678726)
Penetration testing is the common answer, though that job description can also be a bit of a euphemism.

It is also worth noting that breaking into the computer of a foreign national that is located overseas is often not a crime in the united states, or is at least considered very difficult to prosecute if it doesn't involve fraud, financial transfers or a few other hot buttons.

Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW... by nikcub on Thursday March 08, 2012 @03:08AM (#3678972)
Fame, reputation, marketing, using 0day in pen-tests, etc.

This isn't new, security companies have been paying contractors for unpublished advisories and exploits for over 15 years now.

Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW... by eli on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @09:46PM (#3678402)
Well besides the vendor you mean?