Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by rand_r on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @09:06PM
(#3678298)
Ignoring the US government, what legal use would a company have for un-patched exploits?
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by trotsky on Thursday March 08, 2012 @12:45AM
(#3678726)
Penetration testing is the common answer, though that job description can also be a bit of a euphemism.
It is also worth noting that breaking into the computer of a foreign national that is located overseas is often not a crime in the united states, or is at least considered very difficult to prosecute if it doesn't involve fraud, financial transfers or a few other hot buttons.
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by nikcub on Thursday March 08, 2012 @03:08AM
(#3678972)
Fame, reputation, marketing, using 0day in pen-tests, etc.
This isn't new, security companies have been paying contractors for unpublished advisories and exploits for over 15 years now.
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by eli on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @09:46PM
(#3678402)
Well besides the vendor you mean?
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by Sire on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @07:02PM
(#3677941)
Links please.
Re:Chrome exploit and sandbox escape demonstrated at CanSecW...
by lawnchair_larry on Wednesday March 07, 2012 @08:03PM
(#3678143)
To my knowledge, the US government is the biggest buyer of unpublished exploits. And they pay a lot more than 60k. One well-known US-based company is even run by a former NSA employee, and they're currently advertising a remote pre-authentication exploit in the latest version of MySQL.