News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by brightball on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:05PM (#36775783)
I hear that line a lot, yet many of the best schools are religious schools.

It’s one thing if you’re forced into through zoning. It’s an entirely different picture if it’s a choice of parents.

Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by eitally on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:10PM (#36775871)
I'm not aware of any religious public schools that kids are forced into through zoning/districting. I am aware of MANY families who choose parochial schools because of the school quality & culture, but are absolutely not religious (they tolerate the religious part in order to unlock the educational & cultural parts).
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by thebooktocome on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:13PM (#36775921)
Religious schools, particularly in North America, are bastions of physical abuse, child sexual abuse, and discrimination against ethnic, gender, and sexual minorities. This is all very well documented, going back centuries, and is still going on to this day.

I don’t care if they somehow produce on average even 30 points of IQ improvement. They shouldn’t exist.

Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by brigadier132 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:31PM (#36776263)
Hilarious strawman that is not backed by real statistics. I went to a religious jesuit private school, i talk to coworkers about their highschool experiences and they talk about gang violence and drug dealing. Meanwhile the most interesting thing that happened for me is some kids got in a fight once.
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by gjsman-1000 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:16PM (#36775970)
Well, then I hate to tell you how bad public education is then. It is estimated that about 10% of public school students will receive sexual abuse from a teacher or authority at some point in their education.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/02/is-sexual-abuse-...

This was also backed by the US Department of Education in 2004. Since then they've been very hesitant to revisit the issue.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED483143.pdf

The New York Times was also admitting, way back in 1995, that about 5% of public school teachers are abusers. Considering how many teachers a child goes through, they'll probably meet a few.

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/21/nyregion/teacher-student-...

I think that if it wasn't for the fact that it was school, sending your child to any place where there was a 1-in-10 chance of them being sexually abused would be a crime.

Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by RavingGoat on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:26PM (#36776175)
You're going to really hate when you look up how much sexual abuse there is in private schools then.
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by gjsman-1000 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:27PM (#36776193)
Provide examples.
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by nobody9999 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @07:13PM (#36780248)
>Provide examples.

Not GP, but here you go:

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=sexual+abuse+in+private+sch...

Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by gjsman-1000 on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @07:26PM (#36780342)
Lots of claims; but no statistics or estimates of prevalence there. I can point to the US Department of Education… you are pointing to anecdotal news reports.
Re:Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity by thebooktocome on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @02:05PM (#36776803)
Your first link is pretty terrible; it took forever to find the 2000 AAUW report it refers to. Here’s a more current version:

https://www.aauw.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Crossing-the-Line-S...

The 1-in-10 number is self-reported harassment which is different from teacher-on-student abuse but I don’t really care about the distinction. Your 1-in-20 number is a different metric entirely, by the way (as abusers are not one-to-one with abused). Again, I don’t really care about these wrinkles.

Anyway, AAUW’s data doesn’t distinguish between reports from public and public charter, so you can’t use this data to draw conclusions about differences between public and religious schools.

Furthermore, and this is the most important part, their main recommendation to reduce the incidence of abuse and discrimination in all schools (i.e., one of the things I actually want to minimize) is to promote more adherence to Title IX protections.

Private schools have no legal obligation to provide any Title IX protections, and indeed some religious schools, by their very doctrine, cannot.

Next time, if you’re going to demand statistics that don’t exist (as private schools have no reporting requirements and the AAUW report demonstrates that many institutions obviously underreport) please provide better links, thanks.