News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Llama 2 – Meta AI. Parent comment

Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by galaxyLogic on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:54PM (#36775566)
I can see their business logic but isn't it a bit like do not allow people (or bots) talk to each other, they might all get smarter.

I understand trade-secrets are not free-speech but if the goal is to build better AI to serve the humanity the different bots should learn from each other. They should also criticize each other to find flaws in their thinking and biases.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by peddling-brink on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:43PM (#36776456)
> if the goal is to build better AI to serve the humanity

It’s not.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by DeathArrow on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @02:56PM (#36777544)
>but if the goal is to build better AI to serve the humanity

Whose goal is that?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by galaxyLogic on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @12:57AM (#36782268)
Google's. Do no evil they say
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by CamperBob2 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @10:02AM (#36786503)
"Don't be evil" was deprecated from Google's charter around the same time that Apple removed "Computer" from their name.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by visarga on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @04:08PM (#36778407)
There are many datasets created by scraping chatGPT and they seem to work out pretty well. In other words, LLM skills are leaky.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by toomanydoubts on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @06:40PM (#36780004)
The goal is to build better AI to make more money.
[ Parent | on HN ]