News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Does MIT consider legacy? by abirch on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:23PM (#36775025)
I think it's 60-70% of academic achievement can be explained by genes. If you know kids from a big family, their academic success can vary significantly although they have the same parents.
Re:Does MIT consider legacy? by sanitycheck on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:45PM (#36775429)
Sure, and they may not all have the same colour eyes - variation is expected.

But still, we have nature (genes, 60-70%) and nurture (hey, parents again). What else is there?

Re:Does MIT consider legacy? by jncfhnb on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:50PM (#36775518)
Luck (excluding controllable factors by wealthy parents)
Re:Does MIT consider legacy? by abirch on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:50PM (#36776567)
I'd say opportunities. When there are fewer kids matriculating into college it's easier to get into a better school (see Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers)

Professors and Teachers, the variability of them is huge.

Friends can have a huge impact as well. Is the norm to skip classes to go work on a startup or focusing on getting good grades?

Resources such as the Numberblocks which make math more visual and accessible. My pre-K kid was doing multiplication because of that show.

Re:Does MIT consider legacy? by chongli on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:00PM (#36775687)
Yes, and identical twins raised apart show extremely similar academic achievement, far more similar than non-identical siblings raised in the same household. This strongly indicates that academic achievement is highly explained by genes but that recombination [1] causes enough scrambling to result in large variance among non-identical siblings.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_recombination