News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Llama 2 – Meta AI. Parent comment

Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by teaearlgraycold on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:12PM (#36774816)
> greater than 700 million monthly active users

Hmm. Sounds like specifically a FAANG ban. I personally don't mind. But would this be considered anti-competitive and illegal? Not that Google/MS/etc. don't already have their own LLMs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by cheeseface on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:14PM (#36774867)
Most likely they want cloud cloud providers (Google, AWS, and MS) to pay for selling this as a service.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by YetAnotherNick on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:16PM (#36774902)
AWS specifically I think which has history of selling others' products as service. I think Google has better model(Bard 2) and microsoft has rights to openAI models.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by DebtDeflation on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:51PM (#36775526)
They simultaneously announced a deal with MS to make Azure the preferred cloud host. This is aimed at Google and Amazon.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by gmerc on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @07:55AM (#36784904)
AWS is on the partner list
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Llama 2 – Meta AI by whimsicalism on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:12PM (#36774837)
I'm not sure. It actually sort of reminds me of a private version of the EU DMA legislation where they try to define a small group of 'gatekeepers' and only have the legislation impact them.
[ Parent | on HN ]