Incumbents vs. Startups in the AI Race

Re:Incumbents vs. Startups in the AI Race by Pannoniae on Monday July 17, 2023 @08:55PM (#36766358)

How about building an AI/LLM without gimping it afterwards? It's a bit tiring to see the usual "pornography is strictly forbidden" or the "As a language model, I can't <do anything even mildly outside the mainstream thought>...."-type nonsense.

I'm sure that would give them a market edge. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Incumbents vs. Startups in the AI Race by SirMaster on Monday July 17, 2023 @10:09PM (#36766919)

A market edge in legal issues perhaps?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Incumbents vs. Startups in the AI Race by Pannoniae on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @03:51AM (#36769188)

I don't see how it would cause legal issues, a language model isn't their representative, so anything it says doesn't affect the company.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Incumbents vs. Startups in the AI Race by SirMaster on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @02:34PM (#36777235)

I'm not a lawyer, but why do all the other big companies filter their LLMs then?

I really think that people would use it for bad, and people would at least try to take legal action against those creating/hosting the model.

Not that they would lose, but it seems like there would be legal annoyances to deal with at the very least if they don't filter their outputs.

[ Parent | on HN ]