Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by data-ottawa on Sunday July 16, 2023 @12:40AM
(#36743730)
It’s a port of the R ggplot2 api which works the same way. This wouldn’t be a surprise to most R and statistical computing users.
Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by mathisfun123 on Sunday July 16, 2023 @02:56AM
(#36744316)
def __add__(self, other):
self += other
return self
Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by heywhatupboys on Sunday July 16, 2023 @05:26AM
(#36745077)
what is the alternative? python doesn't have a pipe operator
do you want to do
plot(density(colorify(labelaxis(logscale .... )))))))
Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by atombender on Sunday July 16, 2023 @07:08AM
(#36745629)
Python doesn't have a built-in pipe operator, but that doesn't mean you can't do it. The pipe [1] library is popular.
is_even = where(lambda x: x % 2 == 0)
sum(fib() | is_even | take_while(lambda x: x < 4000000)
Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by heywhatupboys on Sunday July 16, 2023 @11:45AM
(#36748295)
I would haver have + than | if we introduce "custom" operators.
Like maybe bitshifting strings into streams wasn't the right syntax, Bjarne
Re:Lets-Plot: An open-source plotting library by JetBrains
by ftobin on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:14AM
(#36768090)
datar effectively recreates a pipe operator and the tidyverse approach.
df >> mutate(z=f.x)
However, what on earth kind of behind the scenes object oriented abstract bastardization have they done wherein you modify the instance of the ggplot class by ADDING stuff to it with a + sign!? Like, when you're trying to toggle one of the flags that would get passed to the class object, why not just do it the way every other class in almost every python library i've ever used does?
I find that horrifying. And I think it is just begging to get some bizarre errors, and I think that