Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scanning before encryption

Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann... by vasco on Saturday July 15, 2023 @05:34PM (#36741159)

From work, but I hope at some point it switches around. So I'll be a good person until then, and after that I'll become a bad person it sounds like

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann... by immibis on Saturday July 15, 2023 @07:20PM (#36741830)

Pretty much. You're a slave who wants to pick so much cotton you'll be able to have slaves of your own one day.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann... by throw47474777j on Saturday July 15, 2023 @08:31PM (#36742235)

Or not, and these aren’t really analogies and in fact are just gibberish.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann... by 8note on Saturday July 15, 2023 @08:26PM (#36742208)

You could already be a bad person, but for now, you're being taken advantage of about as much as you're taking advantage of others.

I think squatting land to make people rent from you to be able to live is already pretty bad, so you could easily already be a bad person, but the concepts of individual ownership over public goods is the really problem,

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann... by hellojesus on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @03:50PM (#36778233)

Are you really suggesting that land is a public good? If it was, how would anyone ever develop it? How could I keep anyone away from my family at night?

[ Parent | on HN ]