News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Donald Triplett was Autism’s “Case 1” by hourago on Saturday July 15, 2023 @04:12PM (#36740522)
> depending on the functioning level in antiquity, I imagine.

The classical difference between them is money. When a powerful person acted "crazy" the term used was "eccentricity".

Re:Donald Triplett was Autism’s “Case 1” by NikkiA on Saturday July 15, 2023 @04:17PM (#36740561)
Mostly, yes. but there were clearly common people in history that were described as 'somewhat eccentric' but still managed a normal-ish life otherwise. The chances are most of those were people who would today be labelled 'high functioning autistic' or 20 years ago would have been labelled as having aspergers.

What money/class-status afforded was the ability to be more eccentric without being pushed into an institution.

Re:Donald Triplett was Autism’s “Case 1” by lolinder on Saturday July 15, 2023 @06:59PM (#36741688)
That's the meme, and it probably did go that way (crazy -> eccentric), but it's also true that someone who was just a little bit off would have been called eccentric whatever their social class.

It would not have been a very effective euphemism for a crazy rich person if it didn't also have the nicer meaning for everyone, rich or poor.