I would concur on the quality of Claude, outstanding and the context window is utterly amazing.
Within the the first two days I already modified my workflow between Claude and GPT.
Claude and GPT4 are on par, Bard lags in quality or just flat gives up. But it is better than 3.5, what it does have going for it is speed.
Claude does seem to be more present. My hunch is that the system prompt is massive or they spent more time fine tuning it on the assistant part of the prompt. Don’t know, but a great tool. Can’t wait for API access.
My book is 160,000 words, so I turned the first 60,000 words into a text file and uploaded it. Then Claude just digests it like any other message.
I did run out of chat/tokens eventually though, which was actually a bit sad
Pretty great! Bit of a party trick at the same time (it did hallucinate a couple of minor things) but enough for me as the writer to be gripped by talking to Claude. It even came up with some really interesting questions to ask me once I told it that I was the author, and many of them were better than a lot of lazy interviewers or reviewers would come up with.
Highly recommended.